FAQ   Search   Memberlist   Usergroups   Register   Profile   Log in to check your private messages   Log in 

Home | Forum | Arcade

So where DID Cain get his wife?
Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6  Next
 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    KTF Forum Index -> Bible Studies
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
bobbyc



Joined: 23 Sep 2006
Posts: 1367

PostPosted: Thu Feb 15, 2007 6:47 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

faith wrote:
Bobby saying that you do not believe the bible to be literal means that you do pick and choose Icon_wink


Even though you soften the barb with a smiley faith, I do object to the implication in your post that I am no more nor better than
Quote:
many non christians who say the bible gives us a good moral code and a sensible way of living


You have seen fit to question the validity of my faith (no pun intended) apparently on grounds no more substantial than the fact that I am not a literalist.

Any "picking and choosing" I do is shaped by the literary genre of any particular section. Despite apparent and assumed appearances the Bible is not, strictly speaking, a (single) book it is a collection of varied writings and each style deserves and needs to be read and understood accordingly.

Elaine, quite how John 5 45 -47 is relevant to this thread is somewhat beyond me. Jesus said many things but it is never wise to take any of his words and wrench them totally out of their context lest they become bereft of meaning altogether. As my old Christian Youth Group leader was fond of saying, "A text taken out of context is a pretext." Since I have already declared myself as a non-literalist please accept that I shall not be easily swayed by an argument claiming literal and logical to be synonymous.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Covenanter



Joined: 28 Aug 2006
Posts: 1446

PostPosted: Thu Feb 15, 2007 9:40 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

faith wrote:
bobbyc wrote:
faith wrote:
Bobby saying that you do not believe the bible to be literal means that you do pick and choose Icon_wink


Even though you soften the barb with a smiley faith, I do object to the implication in your post that I am no more nor better than
Quote:
many non christians who say the bible gives us a good moral code and a sensible way of living


You have seen fit to question the validity of my faith (no pun intended) apparently on grounds no more substantial than the fact that I am not a literalist.

Any "picking and choosing" I do is shaped by the literary genre of any particular section. Despite apparent and assumed appearances the Bible is not, strictly speaking, a (single) book it is a collection of varied writings and each style deserves and needs to be read and understood accordingly.

As you rightly point out Bobby I am not in any position to question the validity of anyone's faith and I did not mean to be rude. I do however have a question for anyone who says I believe this bit but not that bit after all the bible is supposed to be the inspired word of God is it not?


As one who believes the whole Bible to be the inspired Word of God, and who believes Genesis to be the record of creation, we can still question & interpret the Scriptures, & argue about the meaning & significance.

As I understand it, the OT is progressing towards the incarnation & saving work of Christ. There is a significance to many things that left faithful believers, prophets & angels puzzled. 1 Peter 1:10-12. This is the basis of my contention against the Zionists - they insist on a literal understanding of the OT prophecy, and do not allow an interpretation according to Jesus & the Apostles in the NT, & their handling of the OT prophecy.

That said, there is no hint in the NT that the creation account is other than simple truth. I do not think there is room in the creation account for some form of "divinely guided evolution" as any such mechanism requires God to intervene to inspire man, & build on generation of dead pre-adamic beings. Death would necessarily have been in the world before Adam sinned. The whole basis for redemption of Adam's seed by a second Adam would be undermined.

The Lord Jesus quotes Genesis 1 & 2 with authority.

Mat 19:4 And he answered and said unto them, Have ye not read, that he which made [them] at the beginning made them male and female,
5 And said, For this cause shall a man leave father and mother, and shall cleave to his wife: and they twain shall be one flesh?

Rom 5:18 Therefore as by the offence of one [judgment came] upon all men to condemnation; even so by the righteousness of one [the free gift came] upon all men unto justification of life.

_________________
May the God of peace, who through the blood of the eternal covenant brought back from the dead our Lord Jesus, that great Shepherd of the sheep, equip you with everything good for doing his will ... (Hebrews 13:20-21)


Last edited by Covenanter on Thu Feb 15, 2007 9:41 pm; edited 1 time in total
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Elaine



Joined: 20 Jun 2006
Posts: 1712
Location: Derbyshire

PostPosted: Thu Feb 15, 2007 9:41 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

May I suggest Bobby, that your inference that I am using a pretext, is merely a deflection of what the bible verses I used actually say.

If you choose, read the whole chapter, as I did, and put it into context. It will still say exactly the same.

If I was using scripture out of context you may have had a point, but I am using scripture completely in context.

Try re-reading the 10 commandments.

God wrote on stone a short account of creation. Why else did we have a Sabbath. Moses wrote this to be passed on through the generations.
In John chapter 5 v45-47 Jesus said

"45"But do not think I will accuse you
before the Father. Your accuser is Moses, on whom your
hopes are set. 46If you believed Moses,
you would believe me, for he wrote about me.
47But since you do not believe what he wrote,
how are you going to believe what I say?"


This is a perfectly valid scripture to use in this discussion.
_________________
God put me on this earth to do a number of things.
Right now I'm so far behind I'll live forever!!!!!
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
bobbyc



Joined: 23 Sep 2006
Posts: 1367

PostPosted: Thu Feb 15, 2007 10:09 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

No Elaine you are not quoting the verses from John in their context. The setting of them is Jesus telling the Pharisees that they rejected him because they would not believe what Moses wrote concerning the coming of the Son of Man. They read the scriptures but did not see that Jesus was the promised messiah. That is light years away from me not holding a literal belief in the opening chapters of Genesis. I am not a disbelieving Pharisee. Therefore my comment about you using a text as a pretext still stands. The only deflection is me disagreeing with the way you are seeking to apply those gospel verses.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Elaine



Joined: 20 Jun 2006
Posts: 1712
Location: Derbyshire

PostPosted: Thu Feb 15, 2007 10:17 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Sorry Bobby, but I have to disagree.

To say that was all Jesus meant is your interpretation.

Jesus said

"If you believed Moses,
you would believe me, for he wrote about me.
47But since you do not believe what he wrote,
how are you going to believe what I say?"


This is concerning all of what Moses wrote about Jesus, including about the Pharisees not seeing who Jesus was.

Of course it could mean just as you believe, but it can, and probably does, mean so much more.
_________________
God put me on this earth to do a number of things.
Right now I'm so far behind I'll live forever!!!!!
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
Covenanter



Joined: 28 Aug 2006
Posts: 1446

PostPosted: Thu Feb 15, 2007 10:21 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Elaine, Bobby,

I am inclined to agree with what Bobby is saying - if he believes in Jesus as God & Saviour, then the words of Jesus to the Pharisees do not apply.
_________________
May the God of peace, who through the blood of the eternal covenant brought back from the dead our Lord Jesus, that great Shepherd of the sheep, equip you with everything good for doing his will ... (Hebrews 13:20-21)
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Elaine



Joined: 20 Jun 2006
Posts: 1712
Location: Derbyshire

PostPosted: Thu Feb 15, 2007 10:27 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Covenanter wrote:
Elaine, Bobby,

I am inclined to agree with what Bobby is saying - if he believes in Jesus as God & Saviour, then the words of Jesus to the Pharisees do not apply.


By using this passage I am not calling any BA believer a Pharisee.

But what I am saying is that this scripture is useful, as is all scripture, when deciding what we believe. If this were not the case, then these words of Jesus may as well not be read by us, there's no point.

Jesus used what he said, as a way of showing that the Pharisees could not pick and choose which bits of Moses writing they believed. They either believed it all, or they believed none.

And we can certainly learn from that. All of us.
_________________
God put me on this earth to do a number of things.
Right now I'm so far behind I'll live forever!!!!!
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
bobbyc



Joined: 23 Sep 2006
Posts: 1367

PostPosted: Thu Feb 15, 2007 10:54 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Thank you Cov (for the second time tonight!).

Elaine, perhaps we could look a little more closely at John 5. It begins with Jesus healing the lame man at the pool of Betesds (alt. Betsaida or Beth-zatha). This healing was done on the sabbath and Jesus was quickly rebuked and reprimanded by the Pharisees. His response is to say that "My Father never stops working so why should I?"(verse 17). The very next verse explains why the religious leaders "tried all the more to kill him" because not only was Jesus disobeying the Sabbath but "he had spoken of God as his Father, thereby making himself equal with God."

Following a claim that Jesus is not acting alone or independently but is doing the Father's will, Jesus then builds a case to support his claim. Citing first of all John the Baptist and then his own miracles Jesus confronts the Pharisees with the fact that they have ignored John, ignored Jesus' own miracles and therefore ignored God the Father Himself. (verses 31 through to 38). Next Jesus appeals to scripture (the Old Testament obviously) "You search the scriptures because you believe they give you eternal life. But the scriptures point to me!. Yet you refuse to come to me so that I can give you this eternal life." (verses 39 & 40). Now we get to your quoted verses where the key one is surely verse 46. "But if you had believed Moses, you would have believed me because he wrote about me." The whole chapter has been about Jesus proving to the Pharisees that their expected and promised messiah has come among them but they will/do not recognise him despite the testimony of John the Baptist, the miracles Jesus has done and scripture itself. It's not about picking and choosing what to believe it's about ignoring signs pointing to Jesus being the Messiah.

Exegesis is the study and teasing out of what scripture actually says. Eisegesis is when a piece of scripture is misinterpreted often precisely because its context is ignored or forgotten in an attempt to make it prove or mean something that it does not. I honestly believe that I have done exegesis but you have done eisegesis.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
bobbyc



Joined: 23 Sep 2006
Posts: 1367

PostPosted: Thu Feb 15, 2007 10:59 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Jesus nowhere makes mention of the Pharisees adopting a pick'n'mix approach to scripture. They have simply not seen that the writings of Moses (about the messiah) point to Him.Therefore to take what Jesus told the Pharisees and fashion a new application about believing in the literal truth of Genesis is both inappropriate and wrong.

Presumably my previous post filled an allocation of words in a single post because I have had to use this second post to complete what I wanted to say.

The bible version I quoted by the way is the New Living Translation since that's the one immediately to hand.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Sisyphus



Joined: 03 Dec 2006
Posts: 2142
Location: United Kingdom, Not Europe....

PostPosted: Thu Feb 15, 2007 11:44 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

You are spot on Bobby. I went back through John 5 to make sure I hadn't missed anything.

John 5:47 does in fact bolster Elaines original point but only if taken completely out of context to the chapter. Taken in context to the whole it doesn't support that stance at all.
_________________
".... love thy neighbour as thyself." is the hardest thing I have ever done....
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
Elaine



Joined: 20 Jun 2006
Posts: 1712
Location: Derbyshire

PostPosted: Fri Feb 16, 2007 1:03 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

bobbyc wrote:
Thank you Cov (for the second time tonight!).

Elaine, perhaps we could look a little more closely at John 5. It begins with Jesus healing the lame man at the pool of Betesds (alt. Betsaida or Beth-zatha). This healing was done on the sabbath and Jesus was quickly rebuked and reprimanded by the Pharisees. His response is to say that "My Father never stops working so why should I?"(verse 17). The very next verse explains why the religious leaders "tried all the more to kill him" because not only was Jesus disobeying the Sabbath but "he had spoken of God as his Father, thereby making himself equal with God."

Following a claim that Jesus is not acting alone or independently but is doing the Father's will, Jesus then builds a case to support his claim. Citing first of all John the Baptist and then his own miracles Jesus confronts the Pharisees with the fact that they have ignored John, ignored Jesus' own miracles and therefore ignored God the Father Himself. (verses 31 through to 38). Next Jesus appeals to scripture (the Old Testament obviously) "You search the scriptures because you believe they give you eternal life. But the scriptures point to me!. Yet you refuse to come to me so that I can give you this eternal life." (verses 39 & 40). Now we get to your quoted verses where the key one is surely verse 46. "But if you had believed Moses, you would have believed me because he wrote about me." The whole chapter has been about Jesus proving to the Pharisees that their expected and promised messiah has come among them but they will/do not recognise him despite the testimony of John the Baptist, the miracles Jesus has done and scripture itself. It's not about picking and choosing what to believe it's about ignoring signs pointing to Jesus being the Messiah.

Exegesis is the study and teasing out of what scripture actually says. Eisegesis is when a piece of scripture is misinterpreted often precisely because its context is ignored or forgotten in an attempt to make it prove or mean something that it does not. I honestly believe that I have done exegesis but you have done eisegesis.


Am I to assume that Moses only wrote of Jesus in reference to Him being the Messiah?

Moses is credited with writing the first 5 books, including Genesis. Whether the phrase Jesus used was;

"But if you had believed Moses, you would have believed me because he wrote about me." (translation unknown)

"If you believed Moses, you would believe me, for he wrote about me." (NIV)

"46For had ye believed Moses, ye would have believed me; for he wrote of me." (KJV)

makes no difference. In all of these, the fact is that there is a full stop. I am convinced that Jesus is talking of Himself as a whole, and not just the Messiah the pharisees were looking for. He needed to get through to them that to be the Messiah, He also is God. That he did the Fathers will. That He is the Creator.

The pharisees looked forward to the Messiah that they wanted to see, which is why they did not recognise Jesus, He didn't fit their "image" of who the Messiah would be. Just as many today try to change Jesus into someone they want Him to be too.

To recognise Jesus, the pharisees needed to be able to believe what Moses had written about Him, all of what Moses wrote, instead they looked for a messiah that fiited in with what they thought Moses wrote. Basically, they had put a false interpretation on Moses words to suit what they wanted to believe. And I believe that many in the church are doing just the same today.
_________________
God put me on this earth to do a number of things.
Right now I'm so far behind I'll live forever!!!!!
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
watcher



Joined: 19 Jan 2007
Posts: 60

PostPosted: Fri Feb 16, 2007 7:38 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Having watched ( Icon_wink ) this debate unfold, I'd just like to come in here with a specific point about John 5. It seems that the Pharisees were so blinded by their legalistic approach to the law (eg. healing cannot take place on the Sabbath) that they were incapable of seeing that Messiah would have the divine authority to put compassion and mercy before strict letter-of-the-law rules and regulations and that Jesus' healing ministry was, in fact, testimony to his Messiahship. They simply couldn't see beyond their own wooden, unimaginative understanding of the Law or the fact that it would find its 'end' or fulfilment in the person of Jesus the Christ, who proclaimed that love of God and one's fellow-man resumed the whole of the law.

He had already said (5:39) that the whole of Scripture (ie the Old Testament) pointed to his person and I think that now (in 5:46) he is thinking of a specific passage from Moses which demonstrates their wilful, perverse blindness rather than making broad assertions that the whole of Moses' writings - the Pentateuch - were about himself and thus that every single verse in them should be taken in a literal sense, as if not doing so would be tantamount to rejecting him, or not having saving faith.

The passage I'm referring to is Deuteronomy 18:15, where Moses tells Israel that God will one day raise up a prophet like himself (though as the archetype of the greater to come) and the people must listen to him. The apostle Peter significantly cited this text in one of his harangues to the people of Jerusalem, as recorded in Acts 3:22, clearly applying it to Jesus Christ and warning (in v.23) that anyone who does not listen to him will be cut off from God's people. (Think of the scene of the Transfiguration, where God says clearly, "This is my Son, whom I love. With him I am well-pleased. Listen to him!") Now, not to listen to Christ or heed his words and put them into practice is to violate God's command and to challenge the authority of his Messiah - which is precisely what the Pharisees were guilty of when they did not heed his words and rejected him, thereby rejecting the prophecy and warning of the Moses they claimed to follow so loyally ("for he wrote about me".)

I would suggest, therefore, (on the basis of exegesis rather eisegesis, pace Bobby) that this is the whole thrust of John 5:46 and has this specific application rather than the wider extrapolation which some have made here - though it goes without saying that those who do not heed Christ's words ("the words of eternal life" - John 6:68) will share the fate of the unbelieving Pharisees.
_________________
"For with Thee is the fountain of life;
In Thy light we see light."
- Psalm 36:9
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Elaine



Joined: 20 Jun 2006
Posts: 1712
Location: Derbyshire

PostPosted: Fri Feb 16, 2007 10:51 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Watcher, welcome to the debate.

It has wandered some what off topic, for which I take responsibility.

Also, it is only me that seems to find the connection between (the later part of) John 5, and the original point being discussed.

The reason I make this connection, to me at least, is obvious. I stand by the connection.

To everyone, take from it what you will. I see a definate resemblence between the pharisees not being able to see who Jesus really was because they were to busy looking for the messiah they wanted, and christians who have changed Jesus (God) into their image because they, too, do not believe what Moses wrote.

Moses wrote so much more than prophecy about Jesus. He wrote of Jesus being there at the beginning, as creator, yet the pharisees couldn't see this either. But it is confirmed at the beginning of Johns gospel.

Just as the pharisees couldn't see who Jesus was because they didn't make the connection between Moses writings and the man they saw before them. They didn't see that the Messiah was also the Creator. They didn't see that the Messiah would also be God. They didn't see the Messiah as bringing healing and forgiveness. They didn't see the miracles were part of who the Messiah is.

They had altogether been to busy building their own picture of the Messiah that they missed the point completely. And I believe that some christians today are so busy building their own picture of Jesus, that they miss the point too.
_________________
God put me on this earth to do a number of things.
Right now I'm so far behind I'll live forever!!!!!
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
Sisyphus



Joined: 03 Dec 2006
Posts: 2142
Location: United Kingdom, Not Europe....

PostPosted: Fri Feb 16, 2007 12:57 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Elaine wrote:


To everyone, take from it what you will. I see a definate resemblence between the pharisees not being able to see who Jesus really was because they were to busy looking for the messiah they wanted, and christians who have changed Jesus (God) into their image because they, too, do not believe what Moses wrote.

They had altogether been to busy building their own picture of the Messiah that they missed the point completely. And I believe that some christians today are so busy building their own picture of Jesus, that they miss the point too.


I think your point is valid, some Christians and groups do that and they are wrong to do so.

How this started though was not that anyone suggested that they were making their own version of God or Christ, or that they didn't believe what had been written in terms of Jesus being there at the beginning etc.

What was said was that the account of creation being done in six literal days as written was likely to be allegorical rather than literal. That is totally different from making up your own version of God and Christ. I don't believe we understood that you were commenting from that viewpoint. I know I certainly didn't.

I don't think it unreasonable to expect that the ancients who were responsible for writing the early scriptures would use an allegorical story rather than a literal story to explain what is obviously a very complex event. Jesus himself used allegory, as did the apostles and some of the OT writers so we know it was acceptable to do.
Bobby pointed this out that he thought the creation story was more allegorical than literal, but this doesn't bring into question his basic tenets of faith IMHO.
_________________
".... love thy neighbour as thyself." is the hardest thing I have ever done....
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
-theophilus-



Joined: 24 Sep 2006
Posts: 562

PostPosted: Fri Feb 16, 2007 1:03 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Point well made Sisyphus.
_________________
ICXC NIKA!
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    KTF Forum Index -> Bible Studies All times are GMT
Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6  Next
Page 4 of 6

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum


Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2002 phpBB Group : Theme and Graphics created by Tim Blackman
Effex-Media Web Resources


Free Forum Free Top Site List
Make this Forum Ad-Free




902807