FAQ   Search   Memberlist   Usergroups   Register   Profile   Log in to check your private messages   Log in 

Home | Forum | Arcade

John's gospel
Goto page 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6  Next
 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    KTF Forum Index -> Bible Studies
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
davelarge



Joined: 13 Jul 2007
Posts: 219
Location: Left a bit... Right a bit...

PostPosted: Thu Aug 02, 2007 7:13 am    Post subject: John's gospel Reply with quote

After recent talk of biblical interpretation in the Lion's Den, I thought we should have a go at doing some for ourselves.

How about we read John's gospel and study it together? I'm not quite sure how to make it work. Perhaps we should take it a chapter at a time, or a section at a time.

Anyhow. Here is a link to the first portion. Feel free to post any comments you like.

davelarge
_________________
Penguin-powered
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
Covenanter



Joined: 28 Aug 2006
Posts: 1446

PostPosted: Thu Aug 02, 2007 8:42 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Read John literally and you get nowhere. You will NEVER "understand, recognise or receive" the one about whom the book is written.

He demands interpretation. To rephrase the introduction to John in the "Festival of 9 Lessons & Carols," St. John gift wraps the mystery of the incarnation.

Not just any interpretation. When we believe, and receive we become children of God, and have the Holy Spirit to enlighten us.
_________________
May the God of peace, who through the blood of the eternal covenant brought back from the dead our Lord Jesus, that great Shepherd of the sheep, equip you with everything good for doing his will ... (Hebrews 13:20-21)
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
jtheb



Joined: 21 Jun 2006
Posts: 1448
Location: second childhood

PostPosted: Thu Aug 02, 2007 9:10 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

How is reading John literally non productive?

Lets study as suggested.
_________________
The effectiveness of a posting is inversely proportional to its length.
C.S.Craig
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
VictoriaPlum



Joined: 16 Jan 2007
Posts: 718

PostPosted: Thu Aug 02, 2007 9:41 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

John's gospel is lovely. He does a fair bit of interpretation himself! He takes us behind the scenes to show us Jesus's divine nature.

So - let's!
_________________
Vix
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Covenanter



Joined: 28 Aug 2006
Posts: 1446

PostPosted: Thu Aug 02, 2007 10:07 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

jtheb wrote:
How is reading John literally non productive?

Lets study as suggested.


How do you read these words LITERALLY in the context?

WORD, LIFE, LIGHT, DARKNESS .... Why call the word "he"?

John is revealing mysteries. We may be familiar with the Gospel, so that we have a spiritual understanding of the words used, but an untaught reader will be wondering who or what the writer is talking about.
_________________
May the God of peace, who through the blood of the eternal covenant brought back from the dead our Lord Jesus, that great Shepherd of the sheep, equip you with everything good for doing his will ... (Hebrews 13:20-21)
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
davelarge



Joined: 13 Jul 2007
Posts: 219
Location: Left a bit... Right a bit...

PostPosted: Thu Aug 02, 2007 10:34 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

I'll kick us off then.

John 1 vv1-2:
Quote:
In the beginning was the Word, and the Word was with God, and the Word was God. He was with God in the beginning.


Now, I understand that it's accepted that the Word in this context is Jesus. That's a fairly hefty piece of interpretation, and we're only at the sixth word! How can we back this up?


davelarge
_________________
Penguin-powered
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
jtheb



Joined: 21 Jun 2006
Posts: 1448
Location: second childhood

PostPosted: Thu Aug 02, 2007 10:41 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Read on a bit.

In Him was life. The word was made flesh and dwelt among us.

Sel explanatory for the identity of the word.
_________________
The effectiveness of a posting is inversely proportional to its length.
C.S.Craig
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
Covenanter



Joined: 28 Aug 2006
Posts: 1446

PostPosted: Thu Aug 02, 2007 11:05 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

jtheb wrote:
Read on a bit.

In Him was life. The word was made flesh and dwelt among us.

Sel explanatory for the identity of the word.


... provided you know a lot about the incarnation of Jesus from other sources.
_________________
May the God of peace, who through the blood of the eternal covenant brought back from the dead our Lord Jesus, that great Shepherd of the sheep, equip you with everything good for doing his will ... (Hebrews 13:20-21)
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
jtheb



Joined: 21 Jun 2006
Posts: 1448
Location: second childhood

PostPosted: Thu Aug 02, 2007 11:53 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

It is the next few verses.

We are told that the "word" is God, is the Creator, is the Light, and so on.

The ability is only to read and understand the english.
_________________
The effectiveness of a posting is inversely proportional to its length.
C.S.Craig
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
davelarge



Joined: 13 Jul 2007
Posts: 219
Location: Left a bit... Right a bit...

PostPosted: Thu Aug 02, 2007 12:29 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Just to be pedantic: How do you know that "he" is Jesus and not, say, Mohammed?
_________________
Penguin-powered
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
jtheb



Joined: 21 Jun 2006
Posts: 1448
Location: second childhood

PostPosted: Thu Aug 02, 2007 1:31 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

I suppose because the following verses talk about John and his statements that do not apply to mohammed
_________________
The effectiveness of a posting is inversely proportional to its length.
C.S.Craig
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
VictoriaPlum



Joined: 16 Jan 2007
Posts: 718

PostPosted: Thu Aug 02, 2007 2:18 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Muhammed wasn't even a twinkle in his old man's eye then!
----------------
1:1-5 (NRSV)
"All things came into being through him, and without him not one thing came into being. What has come into being in him was life, and the life was the light of all people. The light shines in the darkness, and the darkness did not overcome it."

The "Word" (Greek logos) of God is not just speech, it is Creator God (Gen1.3, Ps 33.6).
_________________
Vix
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
davelarge



Joined: 13 Jul 2007
Posts: 219
Location: Left a bit... Right a bit...

PostPosted: Thu Aug 02, 2007 3:00 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

OK, that's good. I think we can justify applying "Logos" to Jesus, but I just wanted to make sure that we'd ticked all the boxes.

So, what does the part about him being God and being with God mean?
_________________
Penguin-powered
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
bobbyc



Joined: 23 Sep 2006
Posts: 1324

PostPosted: Thu Aug 02, 2007 7:24 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

davelarge wrote:
OK, that's good. I think we can justify applying "Logos" to Jesus, but I just wanted to make sure that we'd ticked all the boxes.

So, what does the part about him being God and being with God mean?


It means that He who was "made incarnate of the virgin Mary" was himself God and was always God and as such was present at Creation. The problem is that so much of what we draw from scriptures (and not only John's Gospel) is fed and informed by a recognition/understanding of other scriptures. Also, much as it grieves me to disagree with jtheb but it simply won't do for us only
Quote:
to read and understand the english
since the original Greek words used often have connotations that don't translate easily. A very simple nonbiblical example is that French has two verbs for 'to know' - savoir and connaitre. However they are not interchangeable since savoir is used of knowing facts whilst connaitre is used of knowing people. Our English bible translations are really only starting points. One must look beyond and behind the translation to gain more insight into what the author(s) were trying to convey.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
bobbyc



Joined: 23 Sep 2006
Posts: 1324

PostPosted: Thu Aug 02, 2007 7:26 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

P.S. This is going to be one mighty long thread if the entire Gospel is going to be discussed in this way. Icon_swoon
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    KTF Forum Index -> Bible Studies All times are GMT
Goto page 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6  Next
Page 1 of 6

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum


Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2002 phpBB Group : Theme and Graphics created by Tim Blackman
Effex-Media Web Resources


Free Forum Free Top Site List
Make this Forum Ad-Free




878960