Home | Forum | Arcade
| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
Nancy

Joined: 22 Jun 2006 Posts: 1095 Location: Illinois, U.S.A.
|
Posted: Wed May 16, 2007 11:51 pm Post subject: Rainbow? |
|
|
Every time it rains here I always look for a rainbow afterwards. I think of the "story" of the rainbow + how God used it as a symbol that He would never again destroy life on earrth with a flood.
Is this really true or is it something man has added to scripture? _________________ You O Lord are the potter, I am the clay,the work of Your hands. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
watcher

Joined: 19 Jan 2007 Posts: 60
|
Posted: Thu May 17, 2007 5:44 am Post subject: |
|
|
More a sign than a symbol, a sign of God's grace and a convenient reminder whenever seen after rain, or a storm, that God's pledges are irrevocable.
Interestingly, a rainbow appears in Ezekiel's vision of God (1:28) where it reflects God's glory and again in Revelation (4:3) where, once again, it is an element of the dazzling radiance of God in heaven. Perhaps we could say that just as the rainbow in all its beauty followed God's judgement on the pre-Flood world, so the beauty of God in all his glory will be seen by those who by his merciful grace and provision escape the final judgement of all through faith in Jesus Christ, who describes himself by another great sign of hope from the skies in Revelation 22:16, 'the bright morning star'.
As to the origin of the imagery in Genesis 9, presumably the author of Genesis was inspired by God to write what he did rather than its being some kind of imaginative addition to the account. _________________ "For with Thee is the fountain of life;
In Thy light we see light."
- Psalm 36:9 |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Nancy

Joined: 22 Jun 2006 Posts: 1095 Location: Illinois, U.S.A.
|
Posted: Thu May 17, 2007 11:12 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Thanks Watcher.
I wonder if the entire earth was flooded or just he area where Noah was. At any rate, it must have been an awful event to go thru.
I'm just thinking that as Adam disappointed God by sinning + sin continued to abound,maybe it was God's way of eradicating so much sin+trying to get man to start over? _________________ You O Lord are the potter, I am the clay,the work of Your hands. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Covenanter

Joined: 28 Aug 2006 Posts: 1446
|
Posted: Fri May 18, 2007 10:03 am Post subject: |
|
|
The account of Noah & the flood is attested in the New Testament. There is no reason to doubt it as a factual record.
The authors of Genesis declare their names & records.
The NIV shows the translation of the Hebrew "toledot" as account indicating that Genesis is a compilation of the records left by the patriarchs. The first is God's revelation of creation to Adam.
Gen 2:4 This is the account of the heavens and the earth when they were created. When the Lord God made the earth and the heavens--
Gen 5:1 This is the written account of Adam's line. When God created man, he made him in the likeness of God.
Gen 6:9 This is the account of Noah. Noah was a righteous man, blameless among the people of his time, and he walked with God.
Gen 10:1 This is the account of Shem, Ham and Japheth, Noah's sons, who themselves had sons after the flood. The Japhethites
Gen 11:10 This is the account of Shem. Two years after the flood, when Shem was 100 years old, he became the father* of Arphaxad.
Gen 11:27 This is the account of Terah. Terah became the father of Abram, Nahor and Haran. And Haran became the father of Lot.
Gen 25:12 This is the account of Abraham's son Ishmael, whom Sarah's maidservant, Hagar the Egyptian, bore to Abraham.
Gen 25:19 This is the account of Abraham's son Isaac. Abraham became the father of Isaac,
Gen 36:1 This is the account of Esau (that is, Edom).
Gen 36:9 This is the account of Esau the father of the Edomites in the hill country of Seir.
Gen 37:2 This is the account of Jacob. Joseph, a young man of seventeen, was tending the flocks with his brothers, the sons of Bilhah and the sons of Zilpah, his father's wives, and he brought their father a bad report about them.
The rainbow was specifically given as a covenant sign - an overarching sign of God's providential care for his creation, to continue while the earth remains.
The fact that it is a covenant sign does not mean that the record is "mythical" but that God gives a natural phenomenon a spiritual significance. _________________ May the God of peace, who through the blood of the eternal covenant brought back from the dead our Lord Jesus, that great Shepherd of the sheep, equip you with everything good for doing his will ... (Hebrews 13:20-21) |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Bev
Joined: 28 Aug 2006 Posts: 124 Location: Orlando, Florida :sunny:
|
Posted: Fri May 18, 2007 5:19 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| The rainbow is an image so full of hope. :D |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Sisyphus

Joined: 03 Dec 2006 Posts: 2142 Location: United Kingdom, Not Europe....
|
Posted: Fri May 18, 2007 5:54 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I have an excellent book, which I can't just lay my hands on called The Rainbow Covenant.
Explores the original covenant between Noah and God after the flood. This is of course, pre the 10 commandments and all that but the book goes through the seven commandments God gave Noah as part of the Noahidic Covenant..... Must try and find it for another read. _________________ ".... love thy neighbour as thyself." is the hardest thing I have ever done.... |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
watcher

Joined: 19 Jan 2007 Posts: 60
|
Posted: Sat May 19, 2007 5:35 am Post subject: |
|
|
On the question of authorship in Genesis and specifically responding to Cov's post, in his commentary on the book Derek Kidner employs the translation 'generations' rather than 'account' and explains (at 2:4):
"The refrain These are the generations divides Genesis into sections at 2:4; 5:1; 6:9; 10:1; 11:10,27; 25:12,19; 36:1,9; 37:2. The word generations (tôledôt) properly means offspring and here it corresponds to 'all the host of them' (2:1). But it can have the wider sense of (family-) history, facing either the past (as in the family registrations of 1 Chronicles 7:4,9, etc.) or the future (as in, eg., Ruth 4:18) according to context.
The view taken here is that this phrase in Genesis always looks forward, introducing a new stage of the book."
This would seem more likely to me, especially given the overall textual consistency of Genesis (though this could be due to later editing, of course) as well as the anonymity of the earlier portions and the sheer unlikelihood of Esau being the author of the section in ch. 36 (not to mention the unlikelihood of the named individuals all leaving disparate written accounts, which, furthermore, survived the extensive spans of time involved). Also, the list in 36:1ff. is simply that; ie. a list rather than any sort of account in the narrative sense. Kidner's assertion that these verses simply serve as introductions to the sections of the book concerning the named individuals and their descendants would seem to be much more probable, then, in my view.
As to the actual authorship of Genesis, it has traditionally been ascribed to Moses, of course, though much of it must have been based on stories passed down in the oral tradition. However, this is a thorny question and perhaps beyond the scope of this thread. _________________ "For with Thee is the fountain of life;
In Thy light we see light."
- Psalm 36:9 |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Isthmian
Joined: 12 May 2007 Posts: 142
|
Posted: Sun May 20, 2007 8:34 am Post subject: |
|
|
Nancy,
Mathew Henry has it thus:
| Quote: | | As the old world was ruined, to be a monument of justice, so this world remains to this day a monument of mercy. But sin, that drowned the old world, will burn this. Articles of agreement among men are sealed, that what is promised may be the more solemn, and the doing of what is covenanted the more sure to mutual satisfaction. The seal of this covenant was the rainbow, which, it is likely, was seen in the clouds before, but was never a seal of the covenant till now it was made so. The rainbow appears when we have most reason to fear the rain prevailing; God then shows this seal of the promise, that it shall not prevail. The thicker the cloud, the brighter the bow in the cloud. Thus, as threatening afflictions abound, encouraging consolations much more abound. The rainbow is the reflection of the beams of the sun shining upon or through the drops of rain: all the glory of the seals of the covenant are derived from Christ, the Sun of righteousness. And he will shed a glory on the tears of his saints. A bow speaks terror, but this has neither string nor arrow; and a bow alone will do little hurt. It is a bow, but it is directed upward, not toward the earth; for the seals of the covenant were intended to comfort, not to terrify. As God looks upon the bow, that he may remember the covenant, so should we, that we may be mindful of the covenant with faith and thankfulness. Without revelation this gracious assurance could not be known; and without faith it can be of no use to us; and thus it is as to the still greater dangers to which all are exposed, and as to the new covenant with its blessings.—Matthew Henry Concise |
The covenant of the rainbow and all it showed was made to all the Earth and all flesh in it. Every animal that came out of the ark with Noah was party to this promise as well as man.
The 'bow' of course is only seen as a half circle from mans perspective.
From the perspective of God a rainbow is a complete circle which sets the mind of men racing with the potentials for symbology and meaning. _________________ Preach the gospel at all times. If necessary use words. — St. Francis of Assisi |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Eddie c
Joined: 16 Sep 2006 Posts: 685 Location: Manchester
|
Posted: Sun May 20, 2007 8:36 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| watcher wrote: | On the question of authorship in Genesis and specifically responding to Cov's post, in his commentary on the book Derek Kidner employs the translation 'generations' rather than 'account' and explains (at 2:4):
"The refrain These are the generations divides Genesis into sections at 2:4; 5:1; 6:9; 10:1; 11:10,27; 25:12,19; 36:1,9; 37:2. The word generations (tôledôt) properly means offspring and here it corresponds to 'all the host of them' (2:1). But it can have the wider sense of (family-) history, facing either the past (as in the family registrations of 1 Chronicles 7:4,9, etc.) or the future (as in, eg., Ruth 4:18) according to context.
The view taken here is that this phrase in Genesis always looks forward, introducing a new stage of the book."
This would seem more likely to me, especially given the overall textual consistency of Genesis (though this could be due to later editing, of course) as well as the anonymity of the earlier portions and the sheer unlikelihood of Esau being the author of the section in ch. 36 (not to mention the unlikelihood of the named individuals all leaving disparate written accounts, which, furthermore, survived the extensive spans of time involved). Also, the list in 36:1ff. is simply that; ie. a list rather than any sort of account in the narrative sense. Kidner's assertion that these verses simply serve as introductions to the sections of the book concerning the named individuals and their descendants would seem to be much more probable, then, in my view.
As to the actual authorship of Genesis, it has traditionally been ascribed to Moses, of course, though much of it must have been based on stories passed down in the oral tradition. However, this is a thorny question and perhaps beyond the scope of this thread. |
 _________________ One thing i do know.I was blind but now i see. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Paul
Joined: 26 Jun 2006 Posts: 50
|
Posted: Mon May 21, 2007 8:08 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Ken Ham has written an article about the Rainbow in the latest edition of our magazine, Answers. Subscriptions can be obtained from http://www.answersingenesis.org.
The Flood could not have been just in a local area, because it covered the high hills. Also, for the rainbow to have any meaning, it must have been the first rainbow ever - in other words there was no rain before the Flood. If you believe that the Flood was just in a local area, then God clearly doesn't keep His promises. He promised not to send another Flood, but there have been lots of local floods. However, there has not been another global Flood. That is because God does indeed keep His promises. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
jtheb

Joined: 21 Jun 2006 Posts: 1448 Location: second childhood
|
Posted: Mon May 21, 2007 8:17 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Good points Paul.
But why is there no geological evidence of the flood? _________________ The effectiveness of a posting is inversely proportional to its length.
C.S.Craig |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
bobbyc

Joined: 23 Sep 2006 Posts: 1324
|
Posted: Mon May 21, 2007 8:23 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| I wasn't aware that a rainbow was an inevitable reaction to rainfall. Isn't there a difference though between a promise that the (entire) earth will not be flooded and localised floods? The distinction between Flood and flood so to speak. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Paul
Joined: 26 Jun 2006 Posts: 50
|
Posted: Mon May 21, 2007 8:27 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| jtheb wrote: | Good points Paul.
But why is there no geological evidence of the flood? |
The geological evidence for the Flood is everywhere! Open your eyes, man!
If there was a worldwide Flood, you would expect the world to be covered with lots of sedimentary rock, containing lots of fossils. That's your evidence. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Sisyphus

Joined: 03 Dec 2006 Posts: 2142 Location: United Kingdom, Not Europe....
|
Posted: Mon May 21, 2007 8:36 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Quote: | | Also, for the rainbow to have any meaning, it must have been the first rainbow ever - in other words there was no rain before the Flood. |
As Bobby says, rainbows do not always follow rain so how you arrive at no rain before the flood goodness knows.
Further, where do you get the idea it must have been the first rainbow. The rainbow had meaning because God said this is the meaning of placing a bow in the clouds.
Mathew Henry has it thus:
| Quote: | | The seal of this covenant was the rainbow, which, it is likely, was seen in the clouds before, but was never a seal of the covenant till now it was made so.—Matthew Henry Concise |
It was there before but became a seal of the covenant because God made it so.
I'm curious to know where you get the idea that there was no rain and it was the first rainbow? _________________ ".... love thy neighbour as thyself." is the hardest thing I have ever done.... |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
jtheb

Joined: 21 Jun 2006 Posts: 1448 Location: second childhood
|
Posted: Mon May 21, 2007 8:40 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Quote: |
If there was a worldwide Flood, you would expect the world to be covered with lots of sedimentary rock, containing lots of fossils. That's your evidence. |
Sorry I thought that with the time scale of 4000 years there was not time for sedementary rock formation.
Forgive my ignorance. _________________ The effectiveness of a posting is inversely proportional to its length.
C.S.Craig |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum
|
|