FAQ   Search   Memberlist   Usergroups   Register   Profile   Log in to check your private messages   Log in 

Home | Forum | Arcade

Three in one?
Goto page 1, 2  Next
 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    KTF Forum Index -> Bible & Doctrine
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
Nancy



Joined: 22 Jun 2006
Posts: 1097
Location: Illinois, U.S.A.

PostPosted: Sun May 13, 2007 2:59 pm    Post subject: Three in one? Reply with quote

Why is it that Jesus always stated that His Father was greater than Himself?
He has stated in response to some questions that only the Father knows certain things.
I was brought up to believe that the Father,Son+Spirit are equal,the same.
What am I missing here?
_________________
You O Lord are the potter, I am the clay,the work of Your hands.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
-theophilus-



Joined: 24 Sep 2006
Posts: 562

PostPosted: Sun May 13, 2007 3:07 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Quote:
I was brought up to believe that the Father,Son+Spirit are equal,the same.


Equal but NOT the same Nancy! The Father, the Son, and the Holy Spirit are three seperate persons, the definition (in theological terms) of a person being someone with a will and an intellect. God the Father, God the Son and God the Holy Spirit all have seperate intellects and seperate wills (though their wills are the same, all three will for all mankind to be saved).

They are of the same essence, the Divine essence; they are all co-eternal, uncreated; they are all God.
_________________
ICXC NIKA!
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
watcher



Joined: 19 Jan 2007
Posts: 60

PostPosted: Sun May 13, 2007 7:00 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Also, as some of the church fathers had it, Jesus recapitulates in his humanity (incarnation) the entire life of fallen man, demonstrating perfect obedience to the Father. To this extent, he can set the example for his own flock ("He had to be made like his brethren in all things" - Hebrews 2:17) in acknowledging the greatness of God above all other human considerations. That he could exemplify such humility, lost in the squandered original essential relationship between man and his Creator, in his assuming the persona of a servant while temporarily emptying himself of his divine glory (Philippians 2:5-11) is a remarkable manifestation of divine grace. We cannot claim parity with the Father, as Jesus rightfully could, but we can follow his exquisite example as the author and perfecter of our faith in lauding the Father as the one who is eternally greater than ourselves but who has mercifully reached out to us to bring us home again in the person of his Son.
_________________
"For with Thee is the fountain of life;
In Thy light we see light."
- Psalm 36:9
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Isthmian



Joined: 12 May 2007
Posts: 142

PostPosted: Mon May 14, 2007 7:12 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Further, Jesus greatest sacrifice was not only the work on the cross, but his giving up his Godhead to become man, to sacrifice his divinity in order to come among us as man, imagine what that must have been like for him.
Having done that on our behalf he was in the position of being a servant to, and a son of, the one true God. As such he was subject to the will of the Father as are we all.
_________________
Preach the gospel at all times. If necessary use words. — St. Francis of Assisi
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Nancy



Joined: 22 Jun 2006
Posts: 1097
Location: Illinois, U.S.A.

PostPosted: Mon May 14, 2007 10:56 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

As Jesus never stated it(I think) where do you suppose the idea came from that He was both human+divine? I realize He spoke of both the Father+Spirit,but did He ever once mention three in one?
_________________
You O Lord are the potter, I am the clay,the work of Your hands.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
-theophilus-



Joined: 24 Sep 2006
Posts: 562

PostPosted: Tue May 15, 2007 1:23 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Jesus certainly did declare His divinity (I suppose His humanity was never in question amongst those who lived with Him).

"Before Abraham was, I AM", echoing the words of God in the OT when He states the same thing.

"Whoever has seen Me has seen the Father" is another pretty strong statement in favour of Christ's divinity.

There are other examples. Indeed, the reason the Jews wished to crucify Christ was because of His blasphemy (i.e. claiming to be Divine).

The Trinity is less clear, in terms of Scriptural proof. You can read the whole Bible and see many references to God's triune nature.... but you have to be looking for it. The revelation of the Trinity came extra scripturally, with the coming of Holy Spirit and man finally understanding His nature (i.e. also Divine). On Thursday is Ascension day, the day Christ ascended to Heaven with promises that the Holy Spirit would come among the Apsotles. And He remains still.

Glory to God
_________________
ICXC NIKA!
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
bobbyc



Joined: 23 Sep 2006
Posts: 1345

PostPosted: Tue May 15, 2007 8:29 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Scripture does not definitively declare the concept or doctrine of the Trinity at all in the simplest way of things. Trinitarian belief, as theo has pointed out, has been teased out of Christian writings (canonical and non-canonical probably) over the years. If I was being mischievous I might observe that this is actually one in the eye for the sola scriptura brigade. Icon_wink
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Isthmian



Joined: 12 May 2007
Posts: 142

PostPosted: Wed May 16, 2007 8:43 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

There is an excellent web site, newadvent.com, commonly called the Catholic Encyclopedia that has a 'proof from scripture' page for the trinity. It's at http://www.newadvent.org/cathen/15047a.htm#II

I am not Catholic but don't mind utilising their excellent resources as long as one understands the necessarily Catholic slant to any information one finds there.
_________________
Preach the gospel at all times. If necessary use words. — St. Francis of Assisi
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
bobbyc



Joined: 23 Sep 2006
Posts: 1345

PostPosted: Wed May 16, 2007 8:41 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

I have come across that site in the past Isthmian but I still stand by my original observation that scripture does not directly teach the doctrine of the trinity. The doctrine, like that of the Rapture which is held by some Christians, has grown and developed over the years from the interpretation of various scriptures. That being said I do believe (as I have stated on another thread) that the Trinity is arguably the single most essential doctrine that Christians are called to uphold. It is in doing so that Christianity is differentiated from the likes of Christadelphianism and Unitarianism as ersatz forms of Christianity.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Nancy



Joined: 22 Jun 2006
Posts: 1097
Location: Illinois, U.S.A.

PostPosted: Wed May 16, 2007 11:07 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Bobby,could you please rephrase your last sentence? I don't understand so many of those big words....sigh Icon_shy
_________________
You O Lord are the potter, I am the clay,the work of Your hands.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
-theophilus-



Joined: 24 Sep 2006
Posts: 562

PostPosted: Thu May 17, 2007 6:05 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

We should expect to see references to the Trinity littered throughout the Scriptures of course, both Old and New Testament. However it is the Incarnation, the person of Jesus Christ, Who is the revelation to end all revelations and the Illuminator of all.

That is why to read the Trinity in the scriptures, we must already have faith in the revelation of Christ. It is Christ Who drove Paul to retreat with the Scriptures and search for Him there, not the scriptures that revealed Christ to Paul. That is why I agree with Bobby when he says:

bobbyc wrote:
If I was being mischievous I might observe that this is actually one in the eye for the sola scriptura brigade. Icon_wink


Though of course in the absence of sola scriptura we must find another source of authority. The foundation is Christ, but where is the full revelation of Christ to be found? That is where myself and Bobby might disagree...
_________________
ICXC NIKA!
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
Isthmian



Joined: 12 May 2007
Posts: 142

PostPosted: Thu May 17, 2007 8:33 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

bobbyc wrote:
I have come across that site in the past Isthmian but I still stand by my original observation that scripture does not directly teach the doctrine of the trinity.


Certainly, my comment was in no way disputing your original observation as evidenced by my 'proof from scripture' being in inverted commas. Smile 2 The only part of scripture that does specifically teach the doctrine of the trinity is

Quote:
1 John 5:7 For there are three that bear record in heaven, the Father, the Word, and the Holy Ghost: and these three are one.

Which of course is accepted as being an insertion by one or more of the team responsible for the original work on the KJV.

Although it is specifically related to Revelation, I have always been minded of

Quote:
Rev 22:19 And if any man shall take away from the words of the book of this prophecy, God shall take away his part out of the book of life, and out of the holy city, and from the things which are written in this book.


And if this were to be extrapolated to the whole of scripture (which I don't think is unreasonable) then the inserters of 1 John 5:7 could have been taking an incredible risk. I surmise their fear of the King was more immediate than their fear of divine retribution.
_________________
Preach the gospel at all times. If necessary use words. — St. Francis of Assisi
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Eddie c



Joined: 16 Sep 2006
Posts: 685
Location: Manchester

PostPosted: Thu May 17, 2007 11:02 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

bobbyc wrote:
I have come across that site in the past Isthmian but I still stand by my original observation that scripture does not directly teach the doctrine of the trinity. The doctrine, like that of the Rapture which is held by some Christians, has grown and developed over the years from the interpretation of various scriptures. That being said I do believe (as I have stated on another thread) that the Trinity is arguably the single most essential doctrine that Christians are called to uphold. It is in doing so that Christianity is differentiated from the likes of Christadelphianism and Unitarianism as ersatz forms of Christianity.


Bobby, i am confused. Scripture does not directly teach the Trinity.....yet its the single most essential doctrine that christians must uphold.

Nowhere in scripture does it say "believe in the trinity and you will be saved" . I would think that the death and resurrection of Jesus is an altogether more important doctrine that christians should uphold.
_________________
One thing i do know.I was blind but now i see.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Covenanter



Joined: 28 Aug 2006
Posts: 1446

PostPosted: Thu May 17, 2007 11:37 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Isthmian wrote:
bobbyc wrote:
I have come across that site in the past Isthmian but I still stand by my original observation that scripture does not directly teach the doctrine of the trinity.


Certainly, my comment was in no way disputing your original observation as evidenced by my 'proof from scripture' being in inverted commas. Smile 2 The only part of scripture that does specifically teach the doctrine of the trinity is

Quote:
1 John 5:7 For there are three that bear record in heaven, the Father, the Word, and the Holy Ghost: and these three are one.

Which of course is accepted as being an insertion by one or more of the team responsible for the original work on the KJV.

Although it is specifically related to Revelation, I have always been minded of

Quote:
Rev 22:19 And if any man shall take away from the words of the book of this prophecy, God shall take away his part out of the book of life, and out of the holy city, and from the things which are written in this book.


And if this were to be extrapolated to the whole of scripture (which I don't think is unreasonable) then the inserters of 1 John 5:7 could have been taking an incredible risk. I surmise their fear of the King was more immediate than their fear of divine retribution.


Interestingly ....

Note regarding the inaccuracy of the KJV text of Revelation:
There are so many corrections needed in the KJV's text of Revelation, because the KJV's Greek text of Revelation (from Erasmus' Greek text, which later became known as the Textus Receptus) was of very unreliable quality. Not having all of the Greek text of Revelation, Erasmus translated some of Revelation from an aberant edition of the Latin Vulgate into Greek. So some of the KJV text of Revelation is based on the Latin Vulgate -- even an unreliable edition of it -- rather than on an ancient Greek text.


Those verses include Rev. 22:19.
_________________
May the God of peace, who through the blood of the eternal covenant brought back from the dead our Lord Jesus, that great Shepherd of the sheep, equip you with everything good for doing his will ... (Hebrews 13:20-21)
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Sisyphus



Joined: 03 Dec 2006
Posts: 2142
Location: United Kingdom, Not Europe....

PostPosted: Thu May 17, 2007 12:01 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Eddie

Below is the quote from another thread where Bobby first mentioned this and Watcher picked it up and offered more.

watcher wrote:
bobbyc wrote:
I've just started reading a book called The Radical Evangelical (Seeking A Place To Stand) by Dr Nigel Wright. The book was written in 1996 when Dr Wright was Senior Pastor at Altrincham Baptist Church, Cheshire. He had previously been a Lecturer in Christian Doctrine at Spurgeon's College in London.

In the book Dr Wright makes the argument that the only doctrine that needs to be considerd as binding is a belief in the Trinity. I shall let him speak for himself -
Quote:
The doctrine of the Trinity provides the foundation for al other Christian doctrines. Traditionally evangelicals have made particular doctrines such as biblical infallibility, penal substitution and eternal judgement the boundaries between 'sound' and 'unsound' theology. I have argued that the proper 'centre stage' is the trinitarian doctrine of God, and all other aspects radiate from this centre.

Quite so, Bob. As that arch-trinitarian D'Artagnan once said, "One for all and all for one."

Seriously though, that would seem to me to be the essential touchstone of authentic Christian belief, too. All else stems from this once and for all revealed truth about the real nature of God. The pieces in the puzzle might be moved around in varying configurations, but this is the immovable piece which remains at the centre and around which the rest - as Wright says - radiate.


The argument that the doctrine of the Triune God is the root of all else has merit in my mind.
_________________
".... love thy neighbour as thyself." is the hardest thing I have ever done....
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    KTF Forum Index -> Bible & Doctrine All times are GMT
Goto page 1, 2  Next
Page 1 of 2

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum


Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2002 phpBB Group : Theme and Graphics created by Tim Blackman
Effex-Media Web Resources


Free Forum Free Top Site List
Make this Forum Ad-Free




885539