| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
Nancy

Joined: 22 Jun 2006 Posts: 1097 Location: Illinois, U.S.A.
|
Posted: Sun May 13, 2007 2:59 pm Post subject: Three in one? |
|
|
Why is it that Jesus always stated that His Father was greater than Himself?
He has stated in response to some questions that only the Father knows certain things.
I was brought up to believe that the Father,Son+Spirit are equal,the same.
What am I missing here? _________________ You O Lord are the potter, I am the clay,the work of Your hands. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
-theophilus-

Joined: 24 Sep 2006 Posts: 562
|
Posted: Sun May 13, 2007 3:07 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Quote: | | I was brought up to believe that the Father,Son+Spirit are equal,the same. |
Equal but NOT the same Nancy! The Father, the Son, and the Holy Spirit are three seperate persons, the definition (in theological terms) of a person being someone with a will and an intellect. God the Father, God the Son and God the Holy Spirit all have seperate intellects and seperate wills (though their wills are the same, all three will for all mankind to be saved).
They are of the same essence, the Divine essence; they are all co-eternal, uncreated; they are all God. _________________ ICXC NIKA! |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
watcher

Joined: 19 Jan 2007 Posts: 60
|
Posted: Sun May 13, 2007 7:00 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Also, as some of the church fathers had it, Jesus recapitulates in his humanity (incarnation) the entire life of fallen man, demonstrating perfect obedience to the Father. To this extent, he can set the example for his own flock ("He had to be made like his brethren in all things" - Hebrews 2:17) in acknowledging the greatness of God above all other human considerations. That he could exemplify such humility, lost in the squandered original essential relationship between man and his Creator, in his assuming the persona of a servant while temporarily emptying himself of his divine glory (Philippians 2:5-11) is a remarkable manifestation of divine grace. We cannot claim parity with the Father, as Jesus rightfully could, but we can follow his exquisite example as the author and perfecter of our faith in lauding the Father as the one who is eternally greater than ourselves but who has mercifully reached out to us to bring us home again in the person of his Son. _________________ "For with Thee is the fountain of life;
In Thy light we see light."
- Psalm 36:9 |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Isthmian
Joined: 12 May 2007 Posts: 142
|
Posted: Mon May 14, 2007 7:12 am Post subject: |
|
|
Further, Jesus greatest sacrifice was not only the work on the cross, but his giving up his Godhead to become man, to sacrifice his divinity in order to come among us as man, imagine what that must have been like for him.
Having done that on our behalf he was in the position of being a servant to, and a son of, the one true God. As such he was subject to the will of the Father as are we all. _________________ Preach the gospel at all times. If necessary use words. — St. Francis of Assisi |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Nancy

Joined: 22 Jun 2006 Posts: 1097 Location: Illinois, U.S.A.
|
Posted: Mon May 14, 2007 10:56 pm Post subject: |
|
|
As Jesus never stated it(I think) where do you suppose the idea came from that He was both human+divine? I realize He spoke of both the Father+Spirit,but did He ever once mention three in one? _________________ You O Lord are the potter, I am the clay,the work of Your hands. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
-theophilus-

Joined: 24 Sep 2006 Posts: 562
|
Posted: Tue May 15, 2007 1:23 am Post subject: |
|
|
Jesus certainly did declare His divinity (I suppose His humanity was never in question amongst those who lived with Him).
"Before Abraham was, I AM", echoing the words of God in the OT when He states the same thing.
"Whoever has seen Me has seen the Father" is another pretty strong statement in favour of Christ's divinity.
There are other examples. Indeed, the reason the Jews wished to crucify Christ was because of His blasphemy (i.e. claiming to be Divine).
The Trinity is less clear, in terms of Scriptural proof. You can read the whole Bible and see many references to God's triune nature.... but you have to be looking for it. The revelation of the Trinity came extra scripturally, with the coming of Holy Spirit and man finally understanding His nature (i.e. also Divine). On Thursday is Ascension day, the day Christ ascended to Heaven with promises that the Holy Spirit would come among the Apsotles. And He remains still.
Glory to God _________________ ICXC NIKA! |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
bobbyc

Joined: 23 Sep 2006 Posts: 1345
|
Posted: Tue May 15, 2007 8:29 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Scripture does not definitively declare the concept or doctrine of the Trinity at all in the simplest way of things. Trinitarian belief, as theo has pointed out, has been teased out of Christian writings (canonical and non-canonical probably) over the years. If I was being mischievous I might observe that this is actually one in the eye for the sola scriptura brigade.  |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Isthmian
Joined: 12 May 2007 Posts: 142
|
Posted: Wed May 16, 2007 8:43 am Post subject: |
|
|
There is an excellent web site, newadvent.com, commonly called the Catholic Encyclopedia that has a 'proof from scripture' page for the trinity. It's at http://www.newadvent.org/cathen/15047a.htm#II
I am not Catholic but don't mind utilising their excellent resources as long as one understands the necessarily Catholic slant to any information one finds there. _________________ Preach the gospel at all times. If necessary use words. — St. Francis of Assisi |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
bobbyc

Joined: 23 Sep 2006 Posts: 1345
|
Posted: Wed May 16, 2007 8:41 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| I have come across that site in the past Isthmian but I still stand by my original observation that scripture does not directly teach the doctrine of the trinity. The doctrine, like that of the Rapture which is held by some Christians, has grown and developed over the years from the interpretation of various scriptures. That being said I do believe (as I have stated on another thread) that the Trinity is arguably the single most essential doctrine that Christians are called to uphold. It is in doing so that Christianity is differentiated from the likes of Christadelphianism and Unitarianism as ersatz forms of Christianity. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Nancy

Joined: 22 Jun 2006 Posts: 1097 Location: Illinois, U.S.A.
|
Posted: Wed May 16, 2007 11:07 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Bobby,could you please rephrase your last sentence? I don't understand so many of those big words....sigh  _________________ You O Lord are the potter, I am the clay,the work of Your hands. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
-theophilus-

Joined: 24 Sep 2006 Posts: 562
|
Posted: Thu May 17, 2007 6:05 am Post subject: |
|
|
We should expect to see references to the Trinity littered throughout the Scriptures of course, both Old and New Testament. However it is the Incarnation, the person of Jesus Christ, Who is the revelation to end all revelations and the Illuminator of all.
That is why to read the Trinity in the scriptures, we must already have faith in the revelation of Christ. It is Christ Who drove Paul to retreat with the Scriptures and search for Him there, not the scriptures that revealed Christ to Paul. That is why I agree with Bobby when he says:
| bobbyc wrote: | If I was being mischievous I might observe that this is actually one in the eye for the sola scriptura brigade.  |
Though of course in the absence of sola scriptura we must find another source of authority. The foundation is Christ, but where is the full revelation of Christ to be found? That is where myself and Bobby might disagree... _________________ ICXC NIKA! |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Isthmian
Joined: 12 May 2007 Posts: 142
|
Posted: Thu May 17, 2007 8:33 am Post subject: |
|
|
| bobbyc wrote: | | I have come across that site in the past Isthmian but I still stand by my original observation that scripture does not directly teach the doctrine of the trinity. |
Certainly, my comment was in no way disputing your original observation as evidenced by my 'proof from scripture' being in inverted commas. The only part of scripture that does specifically teach the doctrine of the trinity is
| Quote: | | 1 John 5:7 For there are three that bear record in heaven, the Father, the Word, and the Holy Ghost: and these three are one. |
Which of course is accepted as being an insertion by one or more of the team responsible for the original work on the KJV.
Although it is specifically related to Revelation, I have always been minded of
| Quote: | | Rev 22:19 And if any man shall take away from the words of the book of this prophecy, God shall take away his part out of the book of life, and out of the holy city, and from the things which are written in this book. |
And if this were to be extrapolated to the whole of scripture (which I don't think is unreasonable) then the inserters of 1 John 5:7 could have been taking an incredible risk. I surmise their fear of the King was more immediate than their fear of divine retribution. _________________ Preach the gospel at all times. If necessary use words. — St. Francis of Assisi |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Eddie c
Joined: 16 Sep 2006 Posts: 685 Location: Manchester
|
Posted: Thu May 17, 2007 11:02 am Post subject: |
|
|
| bobbyc wrote: | | I have come across that site in the past Isthmian but I still stand by my original observation that scripture does not directly teach the doctrine of the trinity. The doctrine, like that of the Rapture which is held by some Christians, has grown and developed over the years from the interpretation of various scriptures. That being said I do believe (as I have stated on another thread) that the Trinity is arguably the single most essential doctrine that Christians are called to uphold. It is in doing so that Christianity is differentiated from the likes of Christadelphianism and Unitarianism as ersatz forms of Christianity. |
Bobby, i am confused. Scripture does not directly teach the Trinity.....yet its the single most essential doctrine that christians must uphold.
Nowhere in scripture does it say "believe in the trinity and you will be saved" . I would think that the death and resurrection of Jesus is an altogether more important doctrine that christians should uphold. _________________ One thing i do know.I was blind but now i see. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Covenanter

Joined: 28 Aug 2006 Posts: 1446
|
Posted: Thu May 17, 2007 11:37 am Post subject: |
|
|
| Isthmian wrote: | | bobbyc wrote: | | I have come across that site in the past Isthmian but I still stand by my original observation that scripture does not directly teach the doctrine of the trinity. |
Certainly, my comment was in no way disputing your original observation as evidenced by my 'proof from scripture' being in inverted commas. The only part of scripture that does specifically teach the doctrine of the trinity is
| Quote: | | 1 John 5:7 For there are three that bear record in heaven, the Father, the Word, and the Holy Ghost: and these three are one. |
Which of course is accepted as being an insertion by one or more of the team responsible for the original work on the KJV.
Although it is specifically related to Revelation, I have always been minded of
| Quote: | | Rev 22:19 And if any man shall take away from the words of the book of this prophecy, God shall take away his part out of the book of life, and out of the holy city, and from the things which are written in this book. |
And if this were to be extrapolated to the whole of scripture (which I don't think is unreasonable) then the inserters of 1 John 5:7 could have been taking an incredible risk. I surmise their fear of the King was more immediate than their fear of divine retribution. |
Interestingly ....
Note regarding the inaccuracy of the KJV text of Revelation:
There are so many corrections needed in the KJV's text of Revelation, because the KJV's Greek text of Revelation (from Erasmus' Greek text, which later became known as the Textus Receptus) was of very unreliable quality. Not having all of the Greek text of Revelation, Erasmus translated some of Revelation from an aberant edition of the Latin Vulgate into Greek. So some of the KJV text of Revelation is based on the Latin Vulgate -- even an unreliable edition of it -- rather than on an ancient Greek text.
Those verses include Rev. 22:19. _________________ May the God of peace, who through the blood of the eternal covenant brought back from the dead our Lord Jesus, that great Shepherd of the sheep, equip you with everything good for doing his will ... (Hebrews 13:20-21) |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Sisyphus

Joined: 03 Dec 2006 Posts: 2142 Location: United Kingdom, Not Europe....
|
Posted: Thu May 17, 2007 12:01 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Eddie
Below is the quote from another thread where Bobby first mentioned this and Watcher picked it up and offered more.
| watcher wrote: | | bobbyc wrote: | I've just started reading a book called The Radical Evangelical (Seeking A Place To Stand) by Dr Nigel Wright. The book was written in 1996 when Dr Wright was Senior Pastor at Altrincham Baptist Church, Cheshire. He had previously been a Lecturer in Christian Doctrine at Spurgeon's College in London.
In the book Dr Wright makes the argument that the only doctrine that needs to be considerd as binding is a belief in the Trinity. I shall let him speak for himself - | Quote: | | The doctrine of the Trinity provides the foundation for al other Christian doctrines. Traditionally evangelicals have made particular doctrines such as biblical infallibility, penal substitution and eternal judgement the boundaries between 'sound' and 'unsound' theology. I have argued that the proper 'centre stage' is the trinitarian doctrine of God, and all other aspects radiate from this centre. |
|
Quite so, Bob. As that arch-trinitarian D'Artagnan once said, "One for all and all for one."
Seriously though, that would seem to me to be the essential touchstone of authentic Christian belief, too. All else stems from this once and for all revealed truth about the real nature of God. The pieces in the puzzle might be moved around in varying configurations, but this is the immovable piece which remains at the centre and around which the rest - as Wright says - radiate. |
The argument that the doctrine of the Triune God is the root of all else has merit in my mind. _________________ ".... love thy neighbour as thyself." is the hardest thing I have ever done.... |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|