| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
crystal
Joined: 04 Apr 2007 Posts: 308
|
Posted: Sat Apr 28, 2007 4:34 pm Post subject: Responce from the BBC |
|
|
I thought you might be interested in the response I got from the BBC
| Quote: | Thank you for your e-mail regarding 'Waterloo Road' broadcast on 19 April.
We are sorry that you found the storyline regarding Christian
Fundamentalism in this episode offensive as this was never our intention.
We wanted to explore the modern phenomenon of different interest groups
(religious or secular) being allowed to invest in public schools. Earlier
in the series we had looked at this using a business model but also wanted
to investigate faith in this context. For this we choose a fictional hard
line American Creationist organisation. Gerry Preston, the man in charge of
this move into British schools initially has a positive effect on the
school (episode 11), he brings much needed additional investment and starts
prayer groups that many of the children find very useful. However, he soon
comes into conflict with Andrew Treneman who doesn't believe that
Creationism has a place in modern schools. Both men state their differing
views quite forcibly. Andrew is a stated atheist whilst Gerry is a stated
Creationist.
It was never our intention to suggest that either man was 'right' or
'wrong' but their viewpoints are their character's own.
Their flashpoint is over a young girl, Janeece, who has previously been of
special interest for Andrew due to her interest in Dinosaurs. Creationism
(as practiced by Gerry's organisation) teaches that Dinosaurs didn't exist
and Andrew challenges this in a public forum (episode 12). He is also upset
because of a misunderstanding between Janeece and Gerry has led her to burn
some of the school's books.
We felt that the important message of this story was that the children
needed the space to make up their own minds about religion and that
religion in school was not, in and of itself, a bad thing. Indeed, in their
final scene together Andrew tells Janeece to make up her own mind about
religion by reading the Bible.
I hope that this goes some way towards explaining our thought process in
exploring this subject in 'Waterloo Road'. This said, our apologies if this
caused any offence.
Thank you once again for taking the trouble to share your views with us.
Regards
Richard Carey
BBC Information |
This is not a thread for creationism issues PLEASE but about how the media feel that they can use christianity to make a point where they would not use other religions. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Elaine
Joined: 20 Jun 2006 Posts: 1712 Location: Derbyshire
|
Posted: Sat Apr 28, 2007 4:54 pm Post subject: |
|
|
At least they took the time to reply.
It's unfortunate that they (BBC) didn't take there example from existing christian funded academies.
The fact that they chose outlandish extremist views (that probably don't exist, except for a very few) tells of the BBC possibly having "another" agenda wrapped into this story.
Perhaps that agenda includes making christians a laughing stock? And so, by default, making christianity a laughing stock too
They've already done it (to a point) with programmes like Songs of Praise.
But I don't think it's just the BBC that have a problem with christians/christianity, after all Channel 4 had a vieled muslim woman giving their christmas message  _________________ God put me on this earth to do a number of things.
Right now I'm so far behind I'll live forever!!!!! |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
bobbyc

Joined: 23 Sep 2006 Posts: 1324
|
Posted: Sat Apr 28, 2007 6:58 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I rather think that the BBC may well have taken their example from existing Christian funded academies. Richard Carey makes a valid point about interest groups investing in public education. Is it appropriate that one subjective belief is presented as objective fact simply because the source of so much funding wishes it so? Isn't that indoctrination rather than education?
| Quote: | We felt that the important message of this story was that the children needed the space to make up their own minds about religion and that religion in school was not, in and of itself, a bad thing. Indeed, in their
final scene together Andrew tells Janeece to make up her own mind about
religion by reading the Bible. |
Hardly smacks of the BBC taking liberties with Christianity to me.
Elaine, I'm not a creationist but I am a Christian but I still don't see that my faith has been made by this programme. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
crystal
Joined: 04 Apr 2007 Posts: 308
|
Posted: Sat Apr 28, 2007 7:09 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Bobby I assume from your comments that you saw the programme then? |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Elaine
Joined: 20 Jun 2006 Posts: 1712 Location: Derbyshire
|
Posted: Sat Apr 28, 2007 7:16 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Quote: | | I rather think that the BBC may well have taken their example from existing Christian funded academies. Richard Carey makes a valid point about interest groups investing in public education. Is it appropriate that one subjective belief is presented as objective fact simply because the source of so much funding wishes it so? Isn't that indoctrination rather than education? |
But the same can for secularism too.
Having seen a documentary on academies funded by christians, and the standard of education there in, I don't believe the senario in the programme was particularly typical. _________________ God put me on this earth to do a number of things.
Right now I'm so far behind I'll live forever!!!!! |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
bobbyc

Joined: 23 Sep 2006 Posts: 1324
|
Posted: Sat Apr 28, 2007 7:53 pm Post subject: |
|
|
No crystal I didn't see the episode of Waterloo Road but I was responding to the letter you got back from the BBC. Are you implying that it contains errors and inaccuracies about the programme?
Elaine, is evolution taught as fact? No it's presented as a theory. If creationism was likewise presented as a theory alongside evolution there coud be no complaints. However, in Christian academies only the creationist idea is offered. That is indoctrination. The fictional school in Waterloo Road (is that just the name of the programme or of the school too?) is not, as far as I know, one of the Faith Academies that are springing up and that were the focus of the documantary programme that I saw. Most likely it was the one to which you refer Elaine. Consequently you cannot compare Waterloo Road with The King's School(?) because you are not comparing like with like. The BBC's storyline in Waterloo Road was not about the effectiveness of Faith Academies compared to state schools but was about (according to the quoted letter) the consequences when a pressure group gains significant amounts of control and influence within a school. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Elaine
Joined: 20 Jun 2006 Posts: 1712 Location: Derbyshire
|
Posted: Sat Apr 28, 2007 8:11 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I can't remember the name of the school Bobby, but evolution has to be taught in any school other than strictly private ones.
And in most schools, not only is it taught with the ommission of the word "theory", long out-of-date material is used.(Unlike the bible, apparently evolution keeps changing.)
Example; When my daughter was being taught evolution in school, she had to point out that it was a theory. The rest of the class laughed at her. Until that point no-one had told them it is only theory. Her teacher then agreed with her. _________________ God put me on this earth to do a number of things.
Right now I'm so far behind I'll live forever!!!!! |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
bobbyc

Joined: 23 Sep 2006 Posts: 1324
|
Posted: Sat Apr 28, 2007 8:23 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Elaine wrote: | I can't remember the name of the school Bobby, but evolution has to be taught in any school other than strictly private ones.
The Christian Acdemy featured in the documentary was not a private one but it only taught creationism. It wasn't unique because it's not the only Christian Academy in existence.
And in most schools, not only is it taught with the ommission of the word "theory", long out-of-date material is used.(Unlike the bible, apparently evolution keeps changing.) Please can we have proof of this possibly by referencing the schemes of work and textbooks used that schools must have for every subject and not just opinion presented as fact?
Example; When my daughter was being taught evolution in school, she had to point out that it was a theory. The rest of the class laughed at her. Until that point no-one had told them it is only theory. Her teacher then agreed with her. One example hardly proves that this is going on in "most schools". Are you sure that you are not using your own prejudices (in favour of creationism) to make a false case?
|
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
jtheb

Joined: 21 Jun 2006 Posts: 1448 Location: second childhood
|
Posted: Sat Apr 28, 2007 8:38 pm Post subject: |
|
|
There have been changes. I was taught that the thymus was a vestigial organ. That the Pineal gland had no use but was the remains of a third eye.
And a few other things. _________________ The effectiveness of a posting is inversely proportional to its length.
C.S.Craig |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Elaine
Joined: 20 Jun 2006 Posts: 1712 Location: Derbyshire
|
Posted: Sat Apr 28, 2007 8:41 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Don't start again Bobby.
I don't have to prove anything to you, I am being curtious in answering you.
As you know I used to co-run a youth group of over 30 teens. All of these said that they were taught evolution as fact.
I have a very large extended family, the school age children are taught evolution from a very young age, and are not told it is a theory.
I know a science teacher (christian) who taught evolution as fact because that is what she believed.
Another lady I know is very qualified scientifically (but I can't remember exactly what qualifications). She too is a christian, yet believes in evolution. She used to work in labs, and now works in schools. She told me she was going to teach her own children evolution as fact, because that's what she believes.
Shall I go on?
The school in the documentary did teach evolution. They had to. They just made sure that the kids knew it was theory.
I think you might be suffering from selective memory. _________________ God put me on this earth to do a number of things.
Right now I'm so far behind I'll live forever!!!!! |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Elaine
Joined: 20 Jun 2006 Posts: 1712 Location: Derbyshire
|
Posted: Sat Apr 28, 2007 8:43 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Crystal, I'm sorry.
Once again your thread has turned into something it shouldn't be.
That is the last post I'll make of that manner.
I will try to keep on topic, or not post. _________________ God put me on this earth to do a number of things.
Right now I'm so far behind I'll live forever!!!!! |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
crystal
Joined: 04 Apr 2007 Posts: 308
|
Posted: Sat Apr 28, 2007 8:52 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I am saying that the letter was carefully worded and did not address the issues I raised.
I also would like to let it be known that my three children were all taught evolution as fact, and I know that my many nephews and neices have also been taught it as fact. We do not all live in the same area, this is being taught in scotland, in at least 8 different counties in England.
Bobby you are getting very aggressive in your posts, they are attacking rather than debating/discussion.
Try and stop being so personal about your posts. To be honest I do not care if you believe in creation or not, that is not meant as an aggressive statement but just a suggestion that yet again you have taken this off topic. All I wanted to talk about was a tv programme that portrayed Christians as fundies.
They had a memorial for a teacher who had killed herself because she had MS. So whilst the atheist was talking about what a lovely woman she was it was the Christian who talked about how sinful she was for killing herself. He was disrespectful about someone he had never met, so they made sure in the programme that the atheist looked good and the "christian" looked like an uncaring pig.
Debate evolution/creation if you want but all I wanted to talk about here is how tv portrays christianity and yet again it has been hijacked.
I do not know why I bother. I post on a couple of non christian forums and do you know what I have never got into an argument in any of them. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Paul
Joined: 26 Jun 2006 Posts: 50
|
Posted: Sat Apr 28, 2007 8:55 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Bobby clearly doesn't know what he is talking about. There is no City Academy that teaches only creationism. That allegation was made about the Emmanuel School in Gateshead. The allegation was untrue when first made and is still untrue now. Bobby should be aware that substantial libel damages were awarded against someone who kept repeating those untrue allegations on another forum. I will readily personally support the necessary libel action against Bobby if he repeats such lies on this forum again, and I recommend that he accepts publicly in this thread that he is in error, if he wishes to avoid such action.
On another issue on this topic, I know of no creationist group that believes that dinosaurs didn't exist. Indeed, Answers in Genesis - the world's largest creationist organisation - actually uses dinosaurs in its publicity and in its museum.
Last edited by Paul on Sat Apr 28, 2007 9:03 pm; edited 1 time in total |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
bobbyc

Joined: 23 Sep 2006 Posts: 1324
|
Posted: Sat Apr 28, 2007 9:00 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Personally I'm pleased that at least some Christians, as cited by Elaine, are not rubbishing evolution. As for the schools in the documentary I accept the correction that they taught evolution as a theory but it's still a fact that they presented creationism as a truer theory and one that they believed in. It's one of the reasons why the documentary was so newsworthy at the time.
Has the thread really gone offtopic? Crystal suggested that the thread should be about the media using Christianity to make a point. In both Waterloo Road and the aforementioned documentary the media made the point that Creationism is being taught in some schools. If the creationists are doing their job persuasively enough then they would surely attract converts not ridicule.
Edit - I wrote this as Paul was making his post. Don't try to threaten me Paul.
Last edited by bobbyc on Sat Apr 28, 2007 9:04 pm; edited 1 time in total |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Paul
Joined: 26 Jun 2006 Posts: 50
|
Posted: Sat Apr 28, 2007 9:02 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| bobbyc wrote: | | Please can we have proof of this possibly by referencing the schemes of work and textbooks used that schools must have for every subject and not just opinion presented as fact? |
You clearly do not know what you are talking about. Full references and details of all such schemes of work, including several GCSE syllabuses, and the National Curriculum, can be found in my new book, Truth, Lies and Science Education, available from the Answers in Genesis website. Most of the book is a non-academic version of my published thesis, Science and Spirituality in the National Curriculum, which was assessed at a secular university - Cardiff University. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|